Our website uses cookies to enhance and personalize your experience and to display advertisements (if any). Our website may also include third party cookies such as Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click the button to view our Privacy Policy.

Allegations against Odila Castillo: defense responds

Allegations against Odila Castillo: defense responds

On October 1st, the legal representatives of Odila Castillo released an official statement addressing the allegations spread by multiple media sources in Panama. These reports have been described as deliberate assaults motivated by particular financial agendas, aiming to tarnish Castillo’s professional standing and personal character.

Carlos Carillo, part of Castillo’s legal counsel, expressed: “These claims lack foundation and are designed to hinder the professional journey of a young lawyer, alongside her associate, to benefit hidden financial agendas.”

Odila Castillo’s Defense

The defense highlighted that this isn’t the first occurrence of media harassment faced by Castillo. Back in 2021, a Panamanian news organization incorrectly announced an alleged arrest of the attorney related to an investigation, a statement that was later refuted, clarifying that it had no connection to the current issues.

At the press conference, the defense contended that both the recent claims and those made in 2021 are based on half-truths, intended to sabotage her professional endeavors.

Additionally, they argued that the information disseminated about Odila Castillo in the media breaches the principles of confidentiality. They explained that a portion of the investigation originated from a previously resolved family issue, while another facet pertains to immigration activities and tax filings, alongside other information that was acquired illegally.

Unauthorized Monitoring of Odila Castillo

The defense further claimed that Castillo has been under GPS tracking, representing a type of illegal surveillance.

Carrillo concluded by stating: “The fundamental rights of our client have been violated, as enshrined in our Constitution and the law. All necessary legal actions will be initiated to ascertain liability for the damages incurred and those that are intended to be inflicted.”

By Carol Jones

You may also like